We have come across many clients recently who are wanting to move their
funds into the “bank” following the very poor returns of the past 5 years. Their
rationale usually revolves around the fact that at least they would be
guaranteed a return of ±7% per annum compared to the dismal returns from the
What we have to keep reminding them is that yes, they may well get a “guaranteed
return” in the short term, but we can also guarantee them that they will be poorer
in the future if they follow this route. Money markets are great for short term
use – they are not appropriate for long-term investing. As someone once said to
me “If you want to accept cash
returns as your worst-case scenario, then you also have to accept cash returns
as your best-case scenario”
Perhaps it is pertinent to remind ourselves about a few good old
- Markets move in cycles: they go up and down over time (not
necessarily in that order).
- Nobody knows exactly when this will happen – no one can
consistently time the markets.
- Equity markets (shares) should provide out-performance over
the longer term (>10 years) but they are also more volatile over
- High risk does not necessarily imply a high return (take
gambling for instance).
- Diversification is the prudent way to manage risk. This
includes diversification among various asset classes, regions and
- Be mindful of the costs associated with your portfolio –
higher costs will generally lead to lower returns over time.
Now is NOT the time to be deviating from your
investment plan (unless your personal circumstances have changed). We
don’t know which sector will perform best next nor do we know when the rand
will weaken further or even if the market has bottomed. We do know, however, on
balance of probability (built up over a very long time) that as an asset class,
equities will outperform property which
will in turn outperform bonds which will outperform cash (after tax). This
is a fundamental consequence of the risk/return relationship. In fact,
statistics show that SA asset classes have produced the following real returns
Fortune Strategy, Bradley et al (the international experience is similar)
fail to realize is that with the risk/return relationship comes volatility!
There are periods (which can extend for a number of years) when the equity
markets can be extremely volatile – the way to combat this is to have a
well-diversified portfolio with sufficient access to cash (short term funds) so
as to allow you to ignore the ups and downs in the short term. “The psychology of the speculator militates
strongly against his success. For by relation of cause and effect he is most
optimistic when prices are highest and most despondent when they are at the
bottom.” Remember you are an investor and not a speculator.
Warren Buffett who said “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when
others are fearful”. When people start to get greedy then it is time to be
fearful and vice versa. From what I am seeing around me, there is too much fear
– maybe, just maybe, it is time to start “getting greedy”.
I recently saw an advert for RSA Retail Bonds that was advertising “risk-free” returns. This kind of thing really gets up my nose and in my opinion it smacks of false advertising…RSA Retail Bonds are not the only culprits – just about all of the banks do it too. “No fees or commissions” or “Risk-free”.
Let’s get this straight – there is no such thing as a risk-free investment. The reason they are advertised as “risk-free” is because they are only ever referring to one kind of risk; that of volatility! These “investments” never refer to inflation risk and they also assume that “default” risk could never apply either!
Broadly speaking there are 2 kinds of risk that really matter to investors: volatility and inflation and they are kind of on the opposite ends of the risk spectrum from one another. Volatility is a short-term risk whereas inflation is a long-term risk.
When things like RSA Retail Bonds claim to have no risk associated with them they are referring to volatility and that is all. They are not claiming to be risk-free, especially when it comes to inflation risk. This is, in my opinion, misleading. You could well invest your money into these kind of investments believing that you are taking no risk at all (because that is what the adverts imply) and then find out that when your investment falls due that you actually have less money (in real terms) than when you started off – all because you did not take enough risk. It’s kind of ironic that in order to counter inflation risk you need to take some volatility risk.
On top of this, any money invested into the RSA bonds is locked in for a minimum of 2 years. The historic returns from these investments have been around 7% pa. By contrast, if you had invested into an “enhanced income” type unit trust fund you would have had returns of ±8-10%* pa for the past few years and would have had access to all of your capital within 48 hours…and all because you took a little bit of (volatility) risk!
So be warned; RSA Retail Bonds are not “risk free” as is claimed. They carry a significant amount of inflation risk, especially after tax.
*typically these funds are designed to generate returns of “cash+2%”pa. This is not guaranteed and there is a small amount of volatility risk that could apply over periods of less than 12 months.
I see that union members are striking over what they perceive to be an unfair wage increase offer of around 7%…they want somewhere between 11 and 20% (depending on who you read) while the official inflation rate is closer to 4%.
On the face of it their demand seems unreasonable and their rejection of the increase which is already 3% more than inflation also seems ungrateful…or is it?
The problem we have (and that the Reserve Bank has) is that hardly anyone believes that inflation really is 4%. This may be the official figure as released by Stats SA and it may be the measure of the change in the “inflation basket” but for most people in South Africa, that basket is a theoretical one which bears little resemblance to reality for ordinary people whose cost of living has increased by much more than 4% pa.
At 4%, the official inflation figure is unbelievable and does not reflect the actual year on year increases for the average South African. No wonder the unions demand more…I would too!
So Eskom’s been granted increases of 24.8%, 25.8% and 25.9% for the next 3 years. Not as big as they wanted but still significant. What does it mean for us as consumers?
There is a beautiful little rule called the “rule of 72” which states if you want to know how quickly something will double in value/cost you need to divide the number into 72. So based on this, an increase of 25% means that the price of electricity will double just under every 3 years (72/25 = 2.9).
So if you are currently paying R3oo for electricity then this will increase to about R600 in 3 years time (see the tables below for the actual figures). Basically, the cost of electricity will double over the next 3 years and while this may not seem like a lot to you and me right now, the real cost will come through in the related inflationary effects and only time will reveal what that will be.
So as we say in our house when ever you leave a room at night “Eskom thanks you for turning off the lights”.
So it looks like the “fuss” is all over and the equity market is set to run even further…I guess it is at times like these that you need to make sure you are “in for the ride” and not sitting on the sidelines watching it all go by. But it is also important that investors do a little “stock take” (pun intended) and understand/remember the following…afterall, has anyone seen the fat lady sing yet?
- Investing takes time – equity markets can be extremely volatile – remember the past year? They can and do move rapidly in the short term (up and down) and so, if you don’t have time, you cant afford to invest into equities solely (diversify).
- You cant time the markets – if you moved to cash a while back (after the market fell) and are still sitting there – sorry for you! You have missed the best part of the rally. You are either in or out – you cant be both and you cant time it right either!
- Learn to ignore the noise around you – have a plan (know why you are doing what you are doing) and stick to it. Don’t be swayed by the noise.
- Cash is not necessarily a “safe” or “low risk” option – it hardly ever beats inflation over time. And as an investor, inflation is your biggest enemy.
- There are probably still some significant risks in the financial system – share prices have run hard in anticipation of earnings…there are plenty of people trying hard to talk the market up but if there are earnings disappointments then expect to see some more down days…
- Inflation risk is still on the upside – big time – just imagine what the increase in electricity price increases is going to do to inflation (we are not alone in this – the UK is facing similar problems). Tradtionally high inflation is not good for shares…but it could still be a while before we see any siginificant increases in inflation.
Bottom line is this – have a plan and stick to it! If necessary find a good financial planner/coach who will guide you through this and coach you to stay the course.
The Financial Coach™